Definition of "wharfinger"
wharfinger
noun
plural wharfingers
(nautical, chiefly historical) The manager or owner of a wharf (“artificial landing place for ships on a riverbank or shore”).
Quotations
And be it further enacted by the authority aforeſaid, that if any wharfinger, crane keeper, ſearcher, lyghterman, weighter or other officer pertayning to the ſubſidie cuſtome, or cuſtome houſe, doo at any time after the ſaid day, conſent or knowe any offence or thing to bee committed or done contrary to yͤ true meani[n]g of this act, or any article ther in contained, and doo not within one moneth next after knowledge thereof had, diſcloſe the ſame to the chiefe cuſtomer […] ſhall for euery ſuch concelement, or not diſcloſing ſuch offence as is aforeſaid, forf[eit] & loſe C.li. of good and lawful money of England.
1579, “Merchants & Merchandises”, in William Rastall [i.e., William Rastell], editor, A Collection of All the Statutes, from the Beginning of Magna Charta, vnto this Present Yeare of Our Lord God 1579, […], [London]: [Christopher Barker], paragraph 47, page 317, column 2
If fine goods or the like are put into a cloſe Lighter and to be conveyed from the Ship to the Key, it is uſual there that the Maſter ſends a Competent number of his Marriners to look to the Merchandize, if then any of the goods are loſt or imbezled, the Maſter is reſponſible and not the VVharfinger; but if ſuch goods are to be ſent aboard a Ship, there the VVharfinger at his peril muſt take care the ſame be preſerved.
1677, Charles Molloy, “Masters of Ships, Their Actions Considered in Reference to Cases Private and Publick”, in De Jure Maritimo et Navali: Or, A Treatise of Affairs Maritime and of Commerce. […], 2nd edition, London: […] John Bellinger […]; George Dawes […] [a]nd Robert Boulter […], book II, paragraph X, page 200
My conclusions are, that, on the true understanding of the case of Fletcher v. Rylands, the Civil Judge's decree is right. That, if otherwise, the imposing of such a duty upon a landowner is forbidden by precisely the same principles as have forbidden the imposition upon Wharfingers, Railway Companies and Shipowners.
1871 February 15, William Holloway, Acting Chief Justice, “The Madras Railway Company v. The Zaminda’r of Ka’vatinaggur ”, in P[atrick] O’Sullivan, J[ohn] M. C. Mills, editors, Madras High Court Reports: Reports of Cases Decided in the High Court of Madras in 1870 and 1871, Madras, Tamil Nadu: Higginbotham and Co., […], published 1872, page 187
The trade of the Port of London, at any rate in regard to sea-going vessels, tended down the river, and an opening span became less and less necessary every year; and as that need became less, the compensation to wharfingers and others would also become less. Concurrently the need of the railways was growing, and, sooner or later, that need would overcome the opposition of the wharfingers
1896 November 10, Samuel George Homfray, “The Machinery of the Tower Bridge ”, in J. H. T. Tudsbery, editor, Minutes of Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers; with Selected and Abstracted Papers, volume CXXVII, London: Institution [of Civil Engineers], […], published 1897, page 66
It was the wharfinger, seeking whom he might devour. Belacqua gave heed to what was being said to him, and elicited in the end from an exuberance of coprolalia that the main was requiring him to go. "Get off my pier," said the wharfinger rudely, "and let me get home to my tea."
1932 (date written), Samuel Beckett, chapter 2, in Eoin O’Brien, Edith Fournier, editors, Dream of Fair to Middling Women, London; Paris: Calder Publications, published 1993, page 7